"All flesh is corrupted before me; and the powers of darkness prevail upon the earth, among the children of men, in the presence of all the hosts of heaven—which causeth silence to reign, and all eternity is pained, and the angels are waiting the great command to reap down the earth, to gather the tares that they may be burned…” (DC 38.11-12) The supreme court “hearing” conducted on Thursday, September 27, 2018 is one of the most vile, sickening, and disheartening events of my sixty-four-year-old life. There are simply no words to adequately express my disgust. What do I say today? A pox on all their houses, left and right alike; white house, house of representatives, senate, supreme court—the whole sordid, disgusting mess. Indeed, I shake off their filth from my feet, positive that no divine punishment, not even one ten times more severe than that executed against Sodom and Gomorrah, is too severe for these shameless hogs who have turned our government into the very vilest, foulest, and most squalid of pig sties. "O LORD God, to whom vengeance belongeth;
0 Comments
“O Lord… we know that… that we are unworthy before thee; because of the fall our natures have become evil continually…” (Ether 3.2) What an ignoble mess we have made of our government! Truly, truly, a thousand times, truly; more truly than even I knew when some two years ago I placed it in the header of this Mad State of Rebellion page, The heart of the sons of men is full of evil, and madness is in their heart while they live…” As long as they live. Every day that they live. Day in and day out until there are no more days. I think that I can hear the same mournful voice that Enoch heard so many thousands of years ago. “…A voice from the bowels [of the earth], saying: ‘Wo, wo is me, the mother of men; I am pained, I am weary, because of the wickedness of my children. When shall I rest, and be cleansed from the filthiness which is gone forth out of me?” (Moses 7.48) For what mad wickedness and filthiness does mother earth now weep? Let me count the ways. Any number of evils. But, for today’s Mad State of Rebellion post, we have one particularly in mind. First, the naked emperor, Caligula, almost certainly nominated a man for supreme court with an eye toward having a corrupt judge in place that would protect the president from being held accountable for any number—literally, take your pick, any number, we’ll find crimes to match it— of crimes, both personal and societal. Then that nominee sits behind an executive desk facing representatives of the people and lies through his teeth, over, over, and over, and… well, pick your number, again, any number; we’ll find lies to match it. Then there’s the latest mess. Lindsey Graham complains through that most noble and concise means of communication, Tweeter, that requesting an FBI investigation “is more about stalling the process until after November's elections than getting to the truth.” He is very likely correct in his assessment of Democratic intentions. Of course, he neglects to say that, with near certainty and equal accuracy, the GOP’s unwillingness to await the results of an impartial FBI investigation is more about getting a corrupt man in place on the supreme court before “November’s election than getting to the truth.” It other words, no one gives a hoot about the truth— not on either side of the aisle. And everyone gives even less than a hoot about the dignity of either individual personally impacted by the scandal. Disgraceful, is too kind a word for what our elected officials have become. But, of course, they were elected! So, disgraceful is equally insufficient to describe what the American electorate has become. Now, no process, however wise, can make up for the madness that resides in the human heart. And, I wouldn’t want to suggest that the “governing” process of the LDS Church is perfect. There is plenty there to given one pause. And yet, there truly is something to be said for its core principle: “unanimity” (It is often said that the Church is led by ‘a’ prophet. But this is inaccurate. We are led by prophetsssssssssssssss. Nothing happens, whatever the head prophet’s wishes, without the other 14 agreeing— unanimously). So, here’s my pie-in-the-sky suggestion. Write it into the constitution, which ought to be, I feel, as you know, a living rather than dead document. Let the president, of whatever political persuasion, make his nomination for the supreme court. Let a judiciary committee of republicans and democrats—pick your number and ratio— review the nominee. Let them make their recommendation to the full senate. BUT THEIR RECOMMENDATION MUST BE UNANIMOUS. No, 6 to 5 votes. No 11 to 1 decisions. Nope. Its 12 to 0, or bust. Impossible, you say? Never get unanimity, you say? Maybe. But, I don’t think so. A policy of unanimity serves as a check on the power of the individual madman, especially one inclined towards despotism, and checks societal madness by forcing cooperation and compromise. What it would mean is that presidents would understand the need to nominate, to begin with, someone qualified, but politically middle of the road. It would mean that we would be getting middle of the road judges. It would mean that judges could go either way, indeed, they would go either way from case to case. No more swings right to left and left to right. Just stay in the center. Steady as she goes. It seems clear to me that in governance, “unanimity” of some sort is of God. It may very well be the divine means of governance in eternity. It is the only protection that is even remotely strong enough to counteract the madness that is in the human heart, and the madness that is the driving force in society at large. “And every decision made by either of these quorums must be by the unanimous voice of the same; that is, every member in each quorum must be agreed to its decisions, in order to make their decisions of the same power or validity one with the other— (DC 107.27) “And the Egyptians made the children of Israel to serve with rigour: and they made their lives bitter with hard bondage, in morter, and in brick, and in all manner of service in the field: all their service, wherein they made them serve, was with rigour” (Exodus 1.13-14). In a recent Guardian piece on building construction in Nashville, Tennessee, a construction worker is quoted, “They [construction companies] treat us like mules, they will break you down and then throw you away.” It is impossible to read something like this and not think of ancient enslaved construction workers who labored like animals to construct the Egyptian “treasure cities, Pithom and Raamses.” To put it slightly differently, it is impossible to read something like this and not think of America as the modern version of ancient Egypt, with all its magnificence built on oppression. And it is impossible to think of America as the modern version of ancient Egypt and not think of the Lord’s response. “I have surely seen the affliction of my people which are in Egypt, and have heard their cry by reason of their taskmasters; for I know their sorrows” (Exodus 3.7). “I know their sorrows.” This should not be read as a doctrinal statement of omniscience. It is a statement of personal and divine solidarity. Of association. Of connectedness. Of at-one-ment. “I feel your pain.” “I hurt with you.” Then, “The cry of the children of Israel is come unto me: and I have also seen the oppression wherewith the Egyptians oppress them” (Exodus 3.9). Again, this is no abstract dissertation on omniscience, but a statement of personal divine solidarity. “Inasmuch as [they] have done it unto [you] my brethren, [they] have done it unto me” (See Matthew 25.40). Jesus of Nazareth, being the same yesterday, today, and forever, did during his earthly mission exactly as it had done as Yahweh. “And he shall go forth, suffering pains and afflictions and temptations of every kind; and this that the word might be fulfilled which saith he will take upon him the pains and the sicknesses of his people” (Alma 7.11). It is impossible to consider all this and wonder how long it will be before we can finally sing the victorious Song of Moses. “Pharaoh's chariots and his host hath he cast into the sea: his chosen captains also are drowned in the Red sea. The depths have covered them: they sank into the bottom as a stone. Thy right hand, O LORD, is become glorious in power: thy right hand, O LORD, hath dashed in pieces the enemy. And in the greatness of thine excellency thou hast overthrown them that rose up against thee: thou sentest forth thy wrath, which consumed them as stubble. And with the blast of thy nostrils the waters were gathered together, the floods stood upright as an heap, and the depths were congealed in the heart of the sea. The enemy said, I will pursue, I will overtake, I will divide the spoil; my lust shall be satisfied upon them; I will draw my sword, my hand shall destroy them. Thou didst blow with thy wind, the sea covered them: they sank as lead in the mighty waters. Who is like unto thee, O LORD, among the gods? Who is like thee, glorious in holiness, fearful in praises, doing wonders? (Exodus 15.4-11) “And I am sure that the king of Egypt will not let you go, no, not by a mighty hand. And I will stretch out my hand, and smite Egypt with all my wonders which I will do in the midst thereof: and after that he will let you go” (Exodus 3.19-20). introduction
In two consecutive homilies, the first based on Isaiah 56.10-12, the second on DC 101.43-51, we explored the role that watchmen play in preserving the safety of their communities. In the first, we found that ancient Israel’s watchmen, symbolic of Israel’s political and religious leaders, were derelict in their duties of watching for and warning about internal evils that threatened the body politic. We found that their dereliction of duty resulted from their own ineptitude, ignorance, unwillingness, self-interest, and contempt for the flock. Too often, Israel’s religious and political leaders dehumanized their charges, viewing them only as tools: means to be used and abused to accomplish their own selfish ends. Because they did not issue warnings concerning the many societal evils, those evils ran rampant, causing the complete collapse of, first Israelite, and later Jewish society. In both instances, exile followed. The promised land, with its vast potential for good was lost. In the second homily based on DC 101.43-51, we found that Zion’s watchmen, though well-intentioned unlike their ancient Israelite peers, were fatally impaired in fulfilling their duties because Zion’s citizenry refused to advance the creation of the principle tool necessary to the watchmen—in this case a dominant watchtower, representative of the principle and practice of the economic law of consecration. Because of this disadvantage, the watchmen were hindered from seeing, recognizing, and warning about many outside dangers that threatened the well-being of the community—among them, the materialistic idolatry that the world falsely preached as natural, inevitable, and even advantageous to society. As a result, Zion was lost—sold-out, really, by its own citizenry. Exile followed. Subsequent generations then delayed, procrastinated, forgot, abandoned, and, on occasion, denigrated all attempts at establishing a pure city—a city fully dedicated and consecrated to God and his purpose—and yielded to the Babylon’s false claims of inevitability. Babylon invaded, and, if it did not exactly conquer, it diminished Zion’s ability to fulfil its mission as ambassador of peace to a fractured world. Ancient Israel’s story of loss, ancient Judah’s story of loss, and 19th century Mormons’ story of loss is each, essentially, the same story. As tragic as the consequences were for the citizens of these fallen communities, however, they were not the end, or even the worst of the consequences. Worse still, these failed communities left the rest of mankind with either no ambassadors of peace, or with ambassadors seriously debilitated, their message tragically diluted and compromised. In this homily, we will briefly review these historical failures and consider their applicability in our own day. ancient Israel, its watchmen, and its failed ministry Such critical judgements as those found above may seem harsh. But they are not mine. They are the Lord’s. We will begin with Israel’s call as Yahweh’s ambassador, and its failed ministry. God had called ancient Israel, including, or course, Judah, as a servant. “But thou, Israel, art my servant, Jacob whom I have chosen, the seed of Abraham my friend. Thou whom I have taken from the ends of the earth, and called thee from the chief men thereof, and said unto thee, ‘Thou art my servant;’ I have chosen thee, and not cast thee away.”[1] The nation was to be singularly committed to Yahweh and his purposes. “Thou shalt have no other gods before me.”[2] “And thou shalt love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might. They were to establish a society—a society called Zion—that was governed by Yahweh’s principles of a just society. “For the vineyard of the LORD of hosts is the house of Israel, and the men of Judah his pleasant plant: and he looked for judgment [justice, equity], but behold oppression; for righteousness [i.e., right conduct, policy], but behold a cry [of pain].[3] Seeing Zion’s example of a healthy and just society, the other nations of the earth would either appreciate and follow Zion’s example, thus conforming to God’s hope for a world bearing the image and likeness of God, or, engrave the number of the beast into its forehead and collapse under the weight of injustice. It was, then, essential that the nations of this world have an example—a preacher of righteousness. But Israel failed in its ministry. “Hear, ye deaf; and look, ye blind, that ye may see. Who is blind, but my servant? or deaf, as my messenger that I sent? who is blind as he that is perfect, and blind as the LORD’s servant?”[4] It abandoned Yahweh; trading him in for the Baals, masters of fertility, of economy, of profit, of Mammon. “The priests said not, ‘Where is the LORD?’ And they that handle the law knew me not: the pastors also transgressed against me, and the prophets prophesied by Baal, and walked after things that do not profit.” “How canst thou say, ‘I am not polluted, I have not gone after Baalim?’ See thy way in the valley, know what thou hast done: thou art a swift dromedary traversing her ways; a wild ass used to the wilderness, that snuffeth up the wind at her pleasure…”[5] Israel abandoned Yahweh’s principles of the just society and adopted the unjust, oppressive, and enslaving principles of Babylonian consumption. “Hear this, O ye that swallow up the needy, even to make the poor of the land to fail, Saying, ‘When will the new moon be gone, that we may sell corn? and the sabbath, that we may set forth wheat, making the ephah small, and the shekel great, and falsifying the balances by deceit? That we may buy the poor for silver, and the needy for a pair of shoes; yea, and sell the refuse of the wheat?’”[6] Isaiah, Jeremiah, Hosea, Amos, Micah, Ezekiel, they all speak with one voice and make this point… over, and over, and over again, and again, and again. By forsaking God, by dividing its interest between Yahweh and Baal, Israel and Judah not only did harm to themselves, but they left the rest of the world vulnerable to the most destructive forces imaginable. In our quotes above, we have not even scratched the surface of the prophet critique against these two failed disciples and ministers of Yahweh. 19th century Zion, its watchmen, and its failed ministry That the earliest Mormons, with their fellow Christian brethren, saw themselves as the new Israel, or as the Lord’s servants, messengers to the world, hardly seems in need of proof. It was none other than Jesus himself who extended the original call. “Ye are the salt of the earth: but if the salt have lost his savour, wherewith shall it be salted? It is thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out, and to be trodden under foot of men. Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on an hill cannot be hid. Neither do men light a candle, and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick; and it giveth light unto all that are in the house. Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven.”[7] “Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.”[8] Nearly two millennia later, he renewed it in latter-day scripture. “Therefore, if ye have desires to serve God ye are called to the work; for behold the field is white already to harvest; and lo, he that thrusteth in his sickle with his might, the same layeth up in store that he perisheth not, but bringeth salvation to his soul…”[9] According to our interpretation of the parable found in DC 101, latter-day Zion was to present—through doctrine, perhaps, but certainly through example—a society that would produce the fruit of peace. It was to be God’s ambassador for peace. Isaiah had predicted it anciently, and God renewed the assignment in the latter-days. In days to come the Mountain on which stands Yahweh’s temple will be fixed above any other Mountain; lifted above any other height. All nations will come streaming to it; many peoples will come, saying: Come! Let’s go up to Yahweh’s mountain; to the temple of the God of Ya‘qōb. He will teach us his ways, and we shall walk in his paths. For Torah will come out of Ṣîyôn, and the word of Yahweh from Yerûšālāyim. Then will He mediate between nations; He will reconcile many peoples, so that they will retool their swords into plow blades and their spears into pruning instruments. One nation will no longer lift the sword against another, nor will they any longer train for warfare. Come, Oh House of Ya‘qōb, and let us walk in Yahweh’s light.”[10] The latter-day Christians would do this through their work in the Lord’s vineyard, by building Zion. Key to their success would be their observance of the law of consecration. But Zion’s citizenry revolted. They chose profit, Baal, over consecration to God. “Might not this money be given to the exchangers?”[11] The Lord, Himself, confirms the parable’s insight, and identifies their “transgression,” or the “pollution” with which they defiled the land in, principally, economic terms. Zion’s citizenry engaged in “jarrings, and contentions, and envyings, and strifes, and lustful and covetous desires.”[12] The refused to “impart of their substance, as becometh saints, to the poor and afflicted among them; and [were] not united according to the union required by the law of the celestial kingdom.”[13] “In consequence of their transgressions,”[14] Zion’s citizenry sold off and “polluted their inheritances.”[15] Thus were they sent into exile. In other words, the latter-day Zion’s false citizenry was guilty of the same society-killing “Ba’alistic” idolatry of which ancient Israel was guilty. But there was an even greater loss. The law of the celestial kingdom, otherwise known as the law of consecration, was one of the principle means by which Zion would bring peace to the world, and end its constant and continuous economic “jarrings, and contentions, and envyings, and strifes, and lustful and covetous desires”—the principle causes of nearly all global conflicts. Again, Zion’s infidelity left the nations of the world without an effective example or ambassador, thus diminishing the peaceful intents for which Zion was made and to which it was called. Again, this charge that latter-day Zion failed in its calling as minister of world peace is not mine. It is the Lord’s. We have already quoted what is, perhaps, Jesus’ earliest call to his followers to be world ministers, ambassadors of the gospel of peace and joy. “Ye are the salt of the earth: but if the salt have lost his savour, wherewith shall it be salted? It is thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out, and to be trodden under foot of men. Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on an hill cannot be hid. Neither do men light a candle, and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick; and it giveth light unto all that are in the house. Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven.”[16] Our common “missionary reading” of this passage is entirely inadequate to the depth of the saying. There is so much more to this passage than the simple need for individuals to serve as good examples in hopes of others becoming members of “the Church.” This passage is applicable to the community as large and its need to set an example for society in general. As examples of this saying’s deeper meaning, we can consider the only two occasions when this passage is referred to in the Doctrine and Covenants. Both readings are in relation to the saints’ failed attempt to be the kind of Christians who could abide celestial principles—particularly economic—as found in the community called “Zion.” In its first occurrence at DC 101.39-41, we read, “When men are called unto mine everlasting gospel, and covenant with an everlasting covenant, they are accounted as the salt of the earth and are called to be the savor of men; therefore, if that a salt of the earth lose its savor, behold, it is thenceforth good for nothing only to be cast out and trodden under the feet of men. Behold, here is wisdom concerning the children of Zion, even many, but not all; they were found transgressors, therefore they must needs be a chastened—” The latter-day Zion of Jackson County was called to be the “salt of the earth.” But, by its refusal to abide by the celestial principle of consecration, Zion lost its savor, and so was “trodden under the feet of men,” or “chastened.” The next reference to the call of Jesus’ followers as “the salt of the earth” is found in DC 103.7-10. “And by hearkening to observe all the words which I, the Lord their God, shall speak unto them, they shall never cease to prevail until the kingdoms of the world are subdued under my feet, and the earth is given unto the saints, to possess it forever and ever. But inasmuch as they keep not my commandments, and hearken not to observe all my words, the kingdoms of the world shall prevail against them. For they were set to be a light unto the world, and to be the saviors of men; and inasmuch as they are not the saviors of men, they are as salt that has lost its savor, and is thenceforth good for nothing but to be cast out and trodden under foot of men.” Again, we hear the threat of being “cast out and trodden under foot of men.” This, as a consequence of their having failed as a “light to the world” and as “saviors of men.” This failure was the result of their economic “lusts” and unwillingness to live the celestial law of consecration. As Israel did anciently, latter-day Zion left the world without effective “savor.” The would-be ambassador traded in its call for filthy lucre. This was a source of great pain for God. The following lament, found in Psalm 81, is so very, very near the words spoken by God in the sections of the DC that address latter-day Zion’s failure that they might as well have been written for the latter-day failure. “Hear, O my people, and I will testify unto thee: O Israel, if thou wilt hearken unto me; ‘There shall no strange god be in thee; neither shalt thou worship any strange god. I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.’ But my people would not hearken to my voice; and Israel would none of me. So I gave them up unto their own hearts’ lust: and they walked in their own counsels.”[17] In the parable of DC 101, the nobleman of the vineyard laments that if his servants, citizens of his burgeoning kingdom, had done as they were asked they “could have made ready and kept the enemy from breaking down the hedge thereof, and saved my vineyard from the hands of the destroyer.” [18] There is simply no way one can read this and not think, again, of Psalm 81. “Oh that my people had hearkened unto me, and Israel had walked in my ways! I should soon have subdued their enemies, and turned my hand against their adversaries.[19] By Zion’s refusal to abide by the celestial law, its enemies are not subdued. They are left in power. Their power is intact is such a way as to represent a perpetual threat and danger to Zion. Without the far-sighted watchtower of consecration, Babylon and the principles by which it operates, infiltrate the failed citizenry of Zion. This leaves Babylon without a committed and effective check on its ungodly lusts. The world’s citizens are left with the false impression that such lust is completely normal and inevitable; that there are no viable alternatives to its blasphemy. and now? God, we are informed, called Joseph Smith “knowing the calamity which should come upon the inhabitants of the earth.”[20] That same God inspired the prophet to establish a city set on a hill, protected by a watchtower. It was to be an ambassador of peace. Its principle resource for protecting the peace, and its principle example to the world for the maintenance of peace was the economic principle of consecration. Zion would not abide by this celestial law by which peace is achieved and expanded. Because of this failure, the world—including, especially, that portion which might reasonably be considered Zion’s most likely ally: American Christianity—has been left without a credible example. It is left without long-sighed watchmen on the battle ground against evil. The world remains a “dark and dreary waste”[21] without a city set on a hill with its light that shines into the darkness. The world remains a tasteless wasteland without the savor of salt. The salt has lost its savor. This absence of credible watchmen means that one of the principle latter-day “calamities” is left unchecked and unchallenged. It has allowed the calamity to present itself as normal and inevitable. Sometimes, even noble. It has left the world, with our nation the most poisoned of all, subject to the destructive and debilitating power of consumerism, materialism, and inequality: the ever-persistent idolatry of Old Testament fame. Thus, American Christianity, including the descendants of the latter-day’s failed citizenry of Zion, remain blind to and impotently silent concerning these evils. Worse, it participate in them with a gusto that can only be called “religious”—hence idolatrous. Little wonder, then, that Babylon continues to flourish and dominate the world stage. Left unexamined, without criticism, unchecked, and even embraced by those who have been taught and should know better, this consumerism, materialism, and inequality has become the driving force in the lives of individuals and society as a whole— “It’s the economy stupid.” This idolatrous “driving force”—unopposed, and often enthusiastically adopted, by rank and file Christians and their poorly equipped watchmen—left American Society unarmed and vulnerable to Caligula’s blasphemous attack on all that is holy and good. It gave wind to the sails of Caligula’s pirate ship, with its obscene economic popularism. America vibrated to the false “Make America Great Again,” theme with its ungodly premise that Americas could, virtuously, and should, justifiably and emphatically, put themselves first. More damning yet, unconscionable numbers of Christians and their short-sighted watchmen have fully embraced the wanna-be-emperor with his false doctrine and commensurate oppressive practices and policies. Yes, there is a straight line from God’s prescient call of Joseph, to Joseph’s insight into the foundations of peace in this world and beyond, to Zion’s failure to live, itself, and outwardly proclaim that foundation (consecration), to America’s glutenous consumerism, materialism, and inequality, to Caligula and his election. Because of America’s and American Christianity’s embrace of this latter-day calamity of consumerism, materialism, and inequality, along with its embrace of its latest false prophet, the dark and dreary waste will become yet darker and drearier. The entire globe will suffer for this choice. God set his people on a hill so that the world, fully warned and encouraged, could be freely accountable. “Behold, I sent you out to testify and warn the people, and it becometh every man who hath been warned to warn his neighbor. Therefore, they are left without excuse, and their sins are upon their own heads.”[22] His people have failed in this call. Whatever responsibility the public bears in yielding to the tempting song of this latest of sirens, it is less than that of their derelict Christian watchmen. They should have personally known better. They might then have been able to issue an authoritative and effectual warning. As it is, they bear the greater responsibility. According to what I call “The Law of the Watchman,” best articulated to Ezekiel, we, the failed early 21st century Christian watchmen may find that they have blood on their hands. “Son of man, I have made thee a watchman unto the house of Israel: therefore hear the word at my mouth, and give them warning from me. “When I say unto the wicked, ‘Thou shalt surely die; and thou givest him not warning, nor speakest to warn the wicked from his wicked way, to save his life; the same wicked man shall die in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at thine hand. Yet if thou warn the wicked, and he turn not from his wickedness, nor from his wicked way, he shall die in his iniquity; but thou hast delivered thy soul. “‘Again, when a righteous man doth turn from his righteousness, and commit iniquity, and I lay a stumblingblock before him, he shall die: because thou hast not given him warning, he shall die in his sin, and his righteousness which he hath done shall not be remembered; but his blood will I require at thine hand. Nevertheless if thou warn the righteous man, that the righteous sin not, and he doth not sin, he shall surely live, because he is warned; also thou hast delivered thy soul.[23] It seems that almost at the very same time, half a word away, another prophet had been made to understand the same “Law of the Watchman.” “And we did magnify our office unto the Lord, taking upon us the responsibility, answering the sins of the people upon our own heads if we did not teach them the word of God with all diligence; wherefore, by laboring with our might their blood might not come upon our garments; otherwise their blood would come upon our garments, and we would not be found spotless at the last day.”[24] conclusion We Christians, with the guidance of our leaders, are called of God to be watchmen, not only for and amongst ourselves but for all the world. As the light of the world, we are not to hide our light, but to let it shine from such a height that not one spot on earth is left unlit by our unassailable example of God and the kind of Being He is—Holy, yes; consecrated, surely. We are to preserve and add flavor to a world that so often verges on rank rottenness and consumes with transient, tasteless appetites that are devoid of any nutritious substance. We American Christians and our leaders have, to a large extend failed in this call and ministry. For decades, Christianity’s failed watchmen have remained silent concerning the rampant consumer and materialistic decadence that has resulted in an economic inequality that is diametrically opposed to the will of God and his plan of happiness—in time and eternity. The watchmen’s long and protracted dereliction of duty finally left the nation unprepared, undiscerning, and worse, enthusiastic supportive of Caligula and his unholy doctrine of self-centered idolatry and oppressive violence. A shamefully high percentage of Christians supported and continue to support the American Caligula, due to the watchmen’s inept and willing rebellion. Like Caligula of the ancient Roman Empire, who was likely a principle source of “inspiration” for much of the apocalyptic found in the New Testament’s final book, the modern Caligula has called forth a renewed apocalyptic spirit. Perhaps it is all hysteria and exaggeration. Perhaps not. Still, the need for repentance seems unquestionably evident. Is there still time for America’s religious and political watchmen, and we, their charges, to step up, faithfully execute our responsibilities, issue our warning from the watchtower, and deliver not only the nation but the world from a looming conflagration? The Old Testament Seer, Joel, saw and warned of “alarm,” “gloominess,” “thick darkness,” “devouring flames,” “desolate wildernesses,” “pained” faces that “gather blackness.” In the midst of his apocalyptic vision, he asked, with wonder, “Who can abide it?” And yet, he knew, as Paul after him, that God is more powerful than human weaknesses. In His strength He can, as Micah concludes, subdue any, and all sin. “Who is a God like unto thee, that pardoneth iniquity, and passeth by the transgression of the remnant of his heritage? he retaineth not his anger for ever, because he delighteth in mercy. He will turn again, he will have compassion upon us; he will subdue our iniquities; and thou wilt cast all their sins into the depths of the sea.”[25] He will subdue any, and all sin. Yet, we are agents. In forgiving us, He will not act upon us, he will act with us. “Wash you, make you clean; put away the evil of your doings from before mine eyes; cease to do evil; 17Learn to do well; seek judgment, relieve the oppressed, judge the fatherless, plead for the widow. 18Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.”[26] In the end, I must hope that it is not too late. I must believe that even if the light that Jesus asked us to be is no more than a flickering candle, it can draw the “hungry and helpless and cold” out of the desert and into the arms of the Good Shepherd.[27] It may very well be, in fact, that the prophesied time has come when God’s longed-for “day of power” may come. The day when God prepares “a feast of fat things… for the poor; yea, a feast of fat things, of wine on the lees well refined…unto which all the nations shall be invited. First, the rich and the learned, and wise and the noble [who by implication, refuse it]. “And after that cometh the day of my power; then shall the poor, the lame, and the blind, and the deaf, come in unto the marriage of the Lamb, and partake of the supper of the Lord, prepared for the great day to come.”[28] Yes, I must believe, like Joel, that the day of repentance has not passed. But we must awake from our slumber. There can be no delay or equivocation. And we must acknowledge and confess our own willful rebellion, and break our stubbornly wandering hearts if we are going to act the part of healers to a sick and dying world. “Therefore also now, saith the LORD, turn ye even to me with all your heart, and with fasting, and with weeping, and with mourning: And rend your heart, and not your garments, and turn unto the LORD your God: for he is gracious and merciful, slow to anger, and of great kindness, and repenteth him of the evil. Who knoweth if he will return and repent, and leave a blessing behind him…” [29] [1] Isaiah 41.8-9 [2] Exodus 20.3 [3] Isaiah 5.7 [4] Isaiah 42.18-19 [5] Jeremiah 2.8,23-24 [6] Amos 8.4-6 [7] Matthew 5.13-16 [8] Mark 16.15 [9] DC 4.3-4 [10] Isaiah 2.2-5 [11] DC 101.49 [12] DC 101.6 [13] DC 101.3-4 [14] DC 101.2 [15] DC 101.6 [16] Matthew 5.13-16 [17] Psalm 81.8-12 [18] DC 101.54 [19] Verses 13 and 14 [20] DC 1.17 [21] 1 Nephi 8.7 [22] DC 88.81-82 [23] Ezekiel 3.17-21 [24] Jacob 1.19 [25] Micah 7.18-19 [26] Isaiah 1.16-18 [27] See Hymn, “Dear to the Heart of the Shepherd” [28] See DC 58.7-11 [29]Joel 2.12-14 "How can you say, ‘We are wise, In a previous ‘I’m Just Saying…’ post, I mused on the fear, terror, horror, and alarm that is Caligula. I speculated on other possible infamous nicknames that he has well earned: Kishkumen, Gadianton, Amalichkiah. While on the subject of nicknames… I often referred to Bill Clinton as ‘Sherem,’ especially after his deposition in the Monica Lewinski case when he, without any apparent sense of shame, wondered aloud what the definition of ‘is’ is. I associated him with Sherem because of the text’s description of the ancient sophist. “He was learned… he had a perfect knowledge of the language of the people; wherefore, he could use much flattery, and much power of speech, according to the power of the devil” (Jacob 7.4). The man was such an expert flatterer. And how ‘bout that philosophizing, huh? I was reminded of our ol’ latter-day Sherem yesterday as I listened to the soon-to-be-most-junior supreme court judge, Kavanaugh—unfortunately, all the Dems can do is holler, for there is nothing they can do to stop this train wreck. This latest sophist wizard of words was questioned about a several-dozen-page-long paper that he wrote in which he challenged the assertion that ‘all legal experts consider Roe v. Wade to be ‘settled law.’ His defense reminded me of Clinton’s “it depends on what your definition of ‘is’ is” defense. The paper, he asserted, was not intended to argue that the Roe v. Wade decision was not settled law, but, only that not “all” legal experts agreed with that depiction of the law. Is the man really so cynical, and so sure that we are all idiots, as to believe that anyone with half a mind wouldn’t see right through such a specious, dishonest version of reality? The absence of integrity and the obvious, in-your-face contempt with which he holds the institutions of our country is towering, unspeakably so. No wonder Caligula nominated him. He is a man after Caligula’s own heart. For this dissertation on the nature of ‘all,” his mastery of the dark “arts and cunning of the people” (Alma 10.15), and his contempt of truth and the legal processes of judicial appointment, he has certainly earned a place in the honorary ‘hall of Sherem’ (or is it ‘hall of shame’”), and earned the title, “Zeezrom,” a “child of hell” by Amulek’s reckoning (Alma 11.23). Only time will tell if he can rise to the rank of “Korihor” in the hall of shame. Of him, we are told that he was, under Satan’s tutelage, expert in teaching that which was “pleasing unto the carnal mind” (Alma 30.53). So, let the games begin. "And now behold, I say unto you, that the foundation of the destruction of this people is beginning to be laid by the unrighteousness of your lawyers and your judges” (Alma 10.27). And they brought young children to him, that he should touch them: and his disciples rebuked those that brought them. But when Jesus saw it, he was much displeased, and said unto them, The family separation crisis, a deep wound on our nation, and one that will bring upon the nation the judgments of God, is far from over. The administration and the goons who enforce its ungodly policy continue to separate families. And they kick and scream about the injustice of it all as they belatedly and half-heartedly bring mothers, fathers, and children together again. I have friends and family, “Christians” all, who cold-heartedly proclaim that it is the victim’s fault. “They just shouldn’t have come here illegally.” “But,” I complain, “you would do the very same thing they’re doing; you would do anything to save your children from the violence from which they are fleeing.” “Let them do it legally,” they rejoin. “And I suppose you would? Do it legally? “Of course.” “Yeah? Well, then you don’t love your children as much as you claim, because by the time you got in legally your child would be dead and cold in the ground from starvation, or murder, or something much worse. This, because the government you have put in place can’t even find the moral wherewith all to do the right thing and allow even asylum seekers in.” Perhaps there is still time to soften such hard hearts. Perhaps a reminder of what a desperate parent’s love looks like, and how God responds to such desperation can bring a change of heart. “And from thence he arose, and went into the borders of Tyre and Sidon, and entered into an house, and would have no man know it: but he could not be hid. For a certain woman, whose young daughter had an unclean spirit, heard of him, and came and fell at his feet: The woman was a Greek, a Syrophenician by nation; and she besought him that he would cast forth the devil out of her daughter. But Jesus said unto her, ‘Let the children first be filled: for it is not meet to take the children’s bread, and to cast it unto the dogs.’ And she answered and said unto him, ‘Yes, Lord: yet the dogs under the table eat of the children’s crumbs.’ And he said unto her, ‘For this saying go thy way; the devil is gone out of thy daughter.’ And when she was come to her house, she found the devil gone out, and her daughter laid upon the bed” (Mark 7.24-30). See what courage and recklessness a parent’s love of a child wrought! A woman stepped into a man’s world to present and argue for the life and health of her beloved child! A foreign woman, deemed unclean, dared challenge the Savior of mankind! “And she found the devil gone out!” Impressed by a parents love? How about this one? “And when Jesus was passed over again by ship unto the other side, much people gathered unto him: and he was nigh unto the sea. And, behold, there cometh one of the rulers of the synagogue, Jairus by name; and when he saw him, he fell at his feet, and besought him greatly, saying, ‘My little daughter lieth at the point of death: I pray thee, come and lay thy hands on her, that she may be healed; and she shall live’…. While he yet spake, there came from the ruler of the synagogue’s house certain which said, ‘Thy daughter is dead: why troublest thou the Master any further?’ As soon as Jesus heard the word that was spoken, he saith unto the ruler of the synagogue, ‘Be not afraid, only believe.’ And he suffered no man to follow him, save Peter, and James, and John the brother of James. And he cometh to the house of the ruler of the synagogue, and seeth the tumult, and them that wept and wailed greatly. And when he was come in, he saith unto them, ‘Why make ye this ado, and weep? The damsel is not dead, but sleepeth.’ And they laughed him to scorn. But when he had put them all out, he taketh the father and the mother of the damsel, and them that were with him, and entereth in where the damsel was lying. And he took the damsel by the hand, and said unto her, ‘Talitha cumi;’ which is, being interpreted, ‘Damsel, I say unto thee, arise.’ And straightway the damsel arose, and walked; for she was of the age of twelve years. And they were astonished with a great astonishment” (Mark 5.21-23 & 35-43). “He fell at his feet,” this ruler accustomed to honor and prestige. See the risk, the humiliation a parent will accept for the well-being and happiness of their child? Oh, how I hope and pray that Jesus is out there in the deserts of northern Mexico, just south of that American iron curtain, speaking comfortingly to desperate and frightened mothers and fathers? “Be not afraid, only believe. I will bring your children safely back to you. For I, at least, know what it means to be kind, for I am meek and lowly in heart… just like you.” And again, “And one of the multitude answered and said, ‘Master, I have brought unto thee my son, which hath a dumb spirit; and wheresoever he taketh him, he teareth him: and he foameth, and gnasheth with his teeth, and pineth away: and I spake to thy disciples that they should cast him out; and they could not.’ He answereth him, and saith, ‘O faithless generation, how long shall I be with you? How long shall I suffer you? Bring him unto me.’ And they brought him unto him: and when he saw him, straightway the spirit tare him; and he fell on the ground, and wallowed foaming. And he asked his father, ‘How long is it ago since this came unto him?’ And he said, ‘Of a child. And ofttimes it hath cast him into the fire, and into the waters, to destroy him: but if thou canst do any thing, have compassion on us, and help us.’ Jesus said unto him, ‘If thou canst believe, all things are possible to him that believeth.’ And straightway the father of the child cried out, and said with tears, ‘Lord, I believe; help thou mine unbelief.’ When Jesus saw that the people came running together, he rebuked the foul spirit, saying unto him, ‘Thou dumb and deaf spirit, I charge thee, come out of him, and enter no more into him.’ And the spirit cried, and rent him sore, and came out of him: and he was as one dead; insomuch that many said, ‘He is dead.’ But Jesus took him by the hand, and lifted him up; and he arose” (Mark 9.17-27). Can we all pray together? Can we pray that those parents, so unsure about the future, and those children, torn from their parents’ arms by a nation that “foameth” and “gnasheth” against the vulnerable and oppressed foreign refugee, will see “the foul spirit” rebuked, and they made sure and united again in the arms of their loved ones? Who can forget the mother from Nain? “And it came to pass the day after, that he went into a city called Nain; and many of his disciples went with him, and much people. Now when he came nigh to the gate of the city, behold, there was a dead man carried out, the only son of his mother, and she was a widow: and much people of the city was with her. And when the Lord saw her, he had compassion on her, and said unto her, ‘Weep not.’ And he came and touched the bier: and they that bare him stood still. And he said, ‘Young man, I say unto thee, Arise.’ And he that was dead sat up, and began to speak. And he delivered him to his mother. And there came a fear on all: and they glorified God, saying, ‘That a great prophet is risen up among us; and, That God hath visited his people.’ And this rumour of him went forth throughout all Judæa, and throughout all the region round about” (Luke 7.11-17). There is “a great prophet” among us—Indeed one who is more than prophet. He has compassion on those poor, frightened parents. Can we all pray together? Can we pray that he has compassion on those children whom our government has abused and molested and terrorized? Can we pray that their elastic minds, brain paths likely warped and twisted by a warped and twisted abuser, may be made straight, made well, made secure, made happy, made whole? Again, I ask, how far would you go, what would you not do, for love of your children? Though I “got in trouble” the last time I quoted Jesus’ saying—some ridiculous fantasy that I might turn “violent,” as though I do not trust God to recompense Caligula as only He has the right to do—I’ll quote him again. And whoso shall receive one such little child in my name receiveth me. But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea” (Matthew 18.5-6). |
Archives
November 2024
Categories |
RSS Feed