“…The heart of the sons of men There are ten of them. They are most often referred to as “The Ten Commandments,” but sometimes as “The Decalogue” (The Ten Words). We all know what they are. American “Christians,” so-called, and especially “Christian Nationalists” want them displayed in courtrooms, schools, etc. Here and there, in Louisiana, for example, some have even convinced gullible and hypocritical lawmakers to mandate their display—I call them hypocritical, in part, due to their professed contempt for mandates.
At the same time, this same group of people enthusiastically, zealously, and hypocritically supported an American presidential candidate who repeatedly and unrepentantly has violated most of if all of the Ten Commandments to which they so ardently claim allegiance and wish displayed wherever they can find blank wall space. I have said it before, and I say it again now. I will not stop saying it. The man, whose name I refuse to write or utter and who is shamefully to be the next president of the U.S. with huge “Christian” support, is guilty of breaking at least six of the ten commandments—not once, not twice, not in error, but openly and blatantly over and over again over many, many years. He has broken the command, “Thou shalt have no other gods before me.” He has broken the command, “Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy.” He has broken the command, “Thou shalt not commit adultery.” He has broken the command, “Thou shalt not steal.” He has broken the command, “Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.” He has broken the command, “Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour’s.” Those are the ones we know of; the ones we are absolutely 100% sure of. Who knows if he is guilty of having broken the command, “Thou shalt not kill.” It is highly likely that people have died because of his practiced wickedness. But, as he himself as confessed on more than one occasion, he could kill someone publicly and in broad daylight and his supports wouldn’t give a damn. The rationalization of these so-called Christians for supporting such a fatally and irredeemably flawed man is that, well, you know, “All have sinned and come short of the glory of God.”[1] They like to remind those that criticize them and their idolatrous politician that it is only he or she who is without sin that can throw rocks—counsel that they, themselves are as far from keeping as the east is from the west. But I am here to tell you, dear reader, that there have been few sinners more skilled in the dark arts of wickedness than this vile man. His wickedness is bottomless. Paranormal. Devilish. He is by a wide, wide margin the most wicked individual to run for public office in U.S. history. He is by a wide, wide margin the most openly and obviously wicked individual to be elected to public office in U.S. history. We who are sinners cannot compare, compete, or keep up with his wickedness. He is out of our league when it comes to wickedness. Furthermore, he is deserving of every rock thrown at him and no one can be censored for joining in the fray of rock throwing. And while we are throwing rocks, we ought to heave a few American “Christianity’s” way. To be sure, many non-confessing Christians joined in their wicked support of a fatally and irredeemably flawed man. Perhaps we cannot expect our secular society to care about things so archaic as morality. But, in supporting a demon, American “Christianity” has shown itself more than worthy of the divine criticism that God, Himself, threw at it two hundred and twenty years ago in a Colonial era spring forest. Its behavior is not merely hypocritical. Not merely blasphemous. Not merely a stain on its collective character. It is corrupt and an abomination before God.[2] With its support of this vile, lurid, vulgar, profane, cruel, dishonest, wicked, evil, and demonic sociopath, American “Christianity” has shown itself to be in violation of the very first command to have no other gods before the Only, the One, and True God. If it has not already done so, how long can it be before it makes of this man, who utters great and blasphemous things, an idolatrous image and thus breaks the second commandment, “Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them…” I, for one, will not bow the knee to such a beast. Even so, come, Lord Jesus! [1] Romans 3.23 [2] See JSH 1.19
0 Comments
introduction
Those not familiar with current American Evangelical political thought might be unaware of a new, detailed theology concerning the former American president and 2024 GOP presidential candidate. In this theology, evangelicals have drawn a parallel between the ancient Persian Emperor, Cyrus, and the wicked man whose name I refuse to utter or write. Just as God used Cyrus, a godless man, to restore Judah to its ancestral home in the promised land, the theory goes, God is using the wicked New York playboy turned politician to lead American Christians back to their rightful place of dominance over American culture and government This is not the place to examine all that is wrong with this theology or the questionable historical claim that founders of America intended Christianity to dominate American culture or government. Indeed, there is good reason to believe that Jesus, whose kingdom was not of this world, never intended his disciples to participate in flawed and immoral human governments, let along control them. It is perhaps foolishness to draw parallels between Biblical and modern American characters. That said, God, Himself, is not above using what is foolish to accomplish good. “For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe.[1] I have suggested elsewhere that if there is a parallel to be found between a Biblical character and the unnamed American scoundrel, it is most likely the Antichrist of Revelation 13.[2] This is especially so if he is reelected. American Christians would be well advised to forget about Cyrus as a Biblical parallel with the New York playboy and give serious thought to the beast of Revelation 13. But, in this homily, I will engage in my own bit of foolishness and participate in a little Biblical parallelomania. In doing so, I will utilize a different Biblical character as a parallel to the godless New York playboy turned politician. That character is Judah’s king Manasseh. If nothing else, this homily promises to be a fun and informative romp through the Old Testament. Who knows but what in the course of our foolishness and fun, we might learn a thing or two that can serve as a warning about our current trajectory and mad state of rebellion against God. a call to leave the world to serve and evangelize God saw Israel’s suffering under the heavy hand of Egyptian servitude. He delivered the Israelites from their servitude. This is the central story of the Old Testament and allows its authors to draw out the Book’s central theological insight: God is an emancipator of the weak and powerless. It was not, however, only out of a divine hatred for captivity, violence, and oppression that God delivered Israel. He delivered an oppressed people so that He might create a people, a nation, that rejected captivity, violence, and oppression—a nation that would be the mirror opposite of Egypt. In creating such a nation, God hoped to provide an example, a beacon for all the world. With this beacon shining in a darkened world, God hoped to change the world. Israel, then, was God’s servant and messenger to the world; His exemplar of a better world. Isaiah speaks often of Israel’s call. “All nations will come streaming to it; many peoples will come, saying: Come! Let’s go up to Yahweh’s mountain; to the temple of the God of Ya‘qōb. He will teach us his ways, and we shall walk in his paths. For Torah will come out of Ṣîyôn, and the word of Yahweh from Yerûšālāyim.”[3] “Just look at My servant, whom I take hold of, My chosen, in whom I was pleased. I placed My spirit upon him that he should generate justice among the nations… I, Yahweh, called you, as is right, and will empower you and watch over you and present you as a promise to peoples and an example to nations, to open eyes that are blind, to lead captives out of prison; from imprisonment those who abide in darkness.”[4] Because of the law of God that Israel lived and taught, God hoped that the nations would “retool their swords into plow blades and their spears into pruning instruments. One nation will no longer lift the sword against another, nor will they any longer train for warfare.”[5] The Psalmist, too, knows and speaks of Israel’s call as servant and evangelist to the world. “’ĕlohîm! May you show us grace, and bless us! May you lighten us with your presence that how you conduct yourself might be known throughout the earth; made known to all peoples the victory you can bring. That the nations might acknowledge you, all peoples yield to you; that hosts of people might raise a shout of joy when you govern the nations justly, when you supply direction to the peoples of the earth; that the nations might acknowledge you, every people yield to you. Earth will then yield its bounty. ’ĕlohîm, our God, will bless us. ’ĕlohîm will bless us because every corner of the earth reveres him.”[6] Unfortunately, Israel rejected its call and refused to make any effort to fulfill its call. “He won’t call out, or lift or make his voice heard in public. He doesn’t so much as trample a crushed blade of grass, or an already sputtering wick to faithfully generate justice. He was not to grow feint or discouraged until he establish justice on earth; for the ends of the earth await his instruction.”[7] Israel not only failed to be a light to the world, but it set a bad example in the world by mirroring such rogue states as Egypt, Babylon, and Sodom. “Hear the word of the Lord, ye rulers of Sodom; give ear unto the law of our God, ye people of Gomorrah.”[8] Israel, in fact, became worse than any other rogue nation, being less faithful to the one and only true God than they had been to all their false gods. “For pass over the isles of Chittim, and see; and send unto Kedar, and consider diligently, and see if there be such a thing. 11Hath a nation changed their gods, which are yet no gods? but my people have changed their glory for that which doth not profit.”[9] “As I live, saith the Lord God, Sodom thy sister hath not done, she nor her daughters, as thou hast done, thou and thy daughters.”[10] “Manasseh seduced them to do more evil than did the nations whom the Lord destroyed before the children of Israel.”[11] This last quote brings us, finally, to Manasseh. manasseh, final nail in judah’s coffin Israel’s rebellion against God and its refusal to act as God’s servant in the world began right from the start and continued year after year, decade after decade, century after century. Acting in the role of mediator, Jeremiah offered a confession for the nation that it stubbornly refused to make for itself. “We have sinned against the LORD our God, we and our fathers, from our youth even unto this day, and have not obeyed the voice of the LORD our God.”[12] Still, for hundreds of years, God stuck with the nation. God’s longsuffering patience with Israel is a remarkable testimony to the largess of His character. The rebellion continued until the nation’s final days, as the chroniclers of 2 Kings witness. “They have done that which was evil in my sight, and have provoked me to anger, since the day their fathers came forth out of Egypt, even unto this day.”[13] This final notice comes during the reign of King Manasseh. As we have already observed, “Manasseh seduced them [Judah’s citizens] to do more evil than did the nations whom the Lord destroyed before the children of Israel.” Here, we are reminded of King Mosiah’s observation, “For behold, how much iniquity doth one wicked king cause to be committed, yea, and what great destruction!”[14] Manasseh’s wickedness, greater than any Israelite or Jewish king before him, and his people’s wickedness, equal to that of any nation before them, is catalogued in 2 Kings 21. It is a cornucopia of transgressive behavior. And, after hundreds of years of national rebellion, Manasseh’s wickedness and concerted efforts to destroy and reverse centuries of established norms is finally simply too much for God. His patience finally runs out. “And the Lord spake by his servants the prophets, saying, ‘Because Manasseh king of Judah hath done these abominations, and hath done wickedly above all that the Amorites did, which were before him, and hath made Judah also to sin with his idols: therefore thus saith the Lord God of Israel, Behold, I am bringing such evil upon Jerusalem and Judah, that whosoever heareth of it, both his ears shall tingle. And I will stretch over Jerusalem the line of Samaria, and the plummet of the house of Ahab: and I will wipe Jerusalem as a man wipeth a dish, wiping it, and turning it upside down. And I will forsake the remnant of mine inheritance, and deliver them into the hand of their enemies; and they shall become a prey and a spoil to all their enemies…’”[15] When the text finally gets around to recording Judah’s final collapse, we read, “And the Lord sent against him bands of the Chaldees, and bands of the Syrians, and bands of the Moabites, and bands of the children of Ammon, and sent them against Judah to destroy it, according to the word of the Lord, which he spake by his servants the prophets. Surely at the commandment of the Lord came this upon Judah, to remove them out of his sight, for the sins of Manasseh, according to all that he did; and also for the innocent blood that he shed: for he filled Jerusalem with innocent blood; which the Lord would not pardon.”[16] the man i refuse to name is more Manasseh than cyrus As we mentioned in the introduction, in a vain attempt to justify their support for a wicked man, American Christians developed a theology that views Persia’s wicked Cyrus and America’s wicked 2024 GOP candidate for president in parallel. In this theology, God works through both men to accomplish some good, however ignorant of God and His works the men proved to be. Of course, I offer a wholehearted and full-throated, “Amen,” to American Christians’ evaluation concerning the wicked nature of the man I have variously called, “Caligula,” “tRUMP,” “Legion,” “The Beast,” and “Antichrist.” While all power elites in American and world history have been and are flawed in common and predictable ways, this man, whose name I refuse to utter or write, is uniquely, bottomlessly, and perhaps paranormally wicked. Hence all excuses of supporting him because “they are all the same,” flounder on the brutal reality of this man’s unparalleled, unbounded, and bottomless wickedness. Here, I add yet another name to his list of shameful monikers: Manasseh. If we are to look outside of Revelation 13 for Biblical characters who might be seen in some manner parallel to the vile American man, it seems to us that Manasseh, king of Judah is better than Cyrus, king of Persia. Most agree, even many of his supports, that, the American playboy turned politician is a deeply flawed man. America’s Manasseh is wicked beyond words. Like Manasseh of old, he has transgressed every sacred norm. Like Manasseh of old, this depraved American version of Manasseh has seduced American citizens to engage in vile wickedness. His acolytes love the man for his transgressive behavior and speech. At no time do they cheer him more than when he is at his most vulgar. The more vulgar he becomes, the more their love for him grows, bearing witness to the previously concealed vulgarity of his hordes. America’s Manasseh has indicated that if elected, those deems his enemies—his enemies becoming “enemies of the state,” as he becomes the state—can expect harassment, prosecution, and death.[17] If elected, it is very possible, indeed, likely, that he will oversee the shedding of innocent blood just as the Manasseh of old. We could go on. I have no doubt that many books will be written over the next many years and decades cataloguing the wickedness of America’s Manasseh and the wonder that such wickedness could attract such numbers of admirers. There is no telling what wickedness he and his wicked hordes might do if given the unchecked power after which he and they lust. conclusion As bottomless as is the man’s wickedness, and as wondrous as is the attraction of so many millions of American to him and his wickedness, what should give us greatest pause is the possible divine response to America’s Manasseh and his torrent of wickedness. We remember God’s response to Judah’s Manasseh. “Behold, I am bringing such evil upon Jerusalem and Judah, that whosoever heareth of it, both his ears shall tingle. And I will stretch over Jerusalem the line of Samaria, and the plummet of the house of Ahab: and I will wipe Jerusalem as a man wipeth a dish, wiping it, and turning it upside down. And I will forsake the remnant of mine inheritance, and deliver them into the hand of their enemies; and they shall become a prey and a spoil to all their enemies…’” Now, let me be clear. I reject a violent God and the idea that He caused or causes societal or national collapse such as the Old Testament authors credited Him. But I do believe in a God who knows and warns about attitudes and behaviors that necessarily bring societal and national collapse. And I do believe in societal collapse under the weight of national wickedness that reflects rebellion against God and His wise counsel and warnings. I do believe that America’s Manasseh could bring about the end of America just as Judah’s Manasseh brought an end to Judah. To some, of course, this sounds like hysteria and hyperbole. Every nation in history has considered itself exceptional, essential, and inevitable. Every nation, when faced with warnings of its demise, has responded with the same false reasoning and vain and arrogant boasts as those spoken by Laman and Lemuel when they heard the inspired warning of national catastrophe and collapse. “And we know that the people who were in the land of Jerusalem were a righteous people; for they kept the statutes and judgments of the Lord, and all his commandments, according to the law of Moses; wherefore, we know that they are a righteous people; and our father hath judged them...”[18] “Neither did they believe that Jerusalem, that great city, could be destroyed.”[19] We hear much the same propaganda and false security among the Book of Mormon peoples of wicked king Noah. “And now, O king, what great evil hast thou done, or what great sins have thy people committed, that we should be condemned of God or judged of this man? And now, O king, behold, we are guiltless, and thou, O king, hast not sinned; therefore, this man has lied concerning you, and he has prophesied in vain. And behold, we are strong, we shall not come into bondage, or be taken captive by our enemies; yea, and thou hast prospered in the land, and thou shalt also prosper.”[20] Let America beware of such false, vain, arrogant, and destructive bluster. Perhaps God intended America, like ancient Israel, to be a light to the world. I don’t know. But if so, the nation has often stumbled in its call just as ancient Israel. Like ancient Israel, it has at times been the worst of nations. In its love affair with it American Manasseh, it is reaching the nadir of wickedness. God has been incredibly patient with America and its mad state of rebellion against Him. We should all be concerned that if America’s Manasseh is reelected—a greater offense than the reign of Judah’s Manasseh, as, unlike the people then, we have free voice in his selection and rule—God’s undeserved patience will finally come to an end, and He leave us to suffer the natural consequences of our wicked choices and behavior. Perhaps America’s Manasseh will be the one to break the hourglass and allow the sands of time to finally run out on the great American experiment. I, for one, will not be found playing advocate for a wicked and vulgar nation. America’s Manasseh and the America he leads to wickedness and perversion will deserve every bit of the hell it suffers. One hopes it is not too late, and that the day for repentance has not passed. But one sees reasons to fear that Isaiah’s insight into Israel’s mad state of rebellion against God might very well apply to America in 2024. “And He said, “Go, and say this to the people: ‘Listen carefully! But you won’t pay attention. Understand rightly! But you won’t even consider. Pronounce this people’s heart impenetrable, their ears deaf, and their eyes blind lest they see with their eyes, hear with their ears, understand with their heart, return, and be healed.’” “Then I asked, ‘How long, my Lord?’ He answered, ‘Until cities are desolate without inhabitant, houses are without a single occupant, the land is ruined, a desolate waste, and YHWH has removed everyone-- the desolation being tremendous throughout the land.’”[21] benediction “Lord, how long shall the wicked, how long shall the wicked triumph?”[22] “O Lord God, how long wilt thou suffer that such wickedness and infidelity shall be among this people? O Lord, wilt thou give me strength, that I may bear with mine infirmities. For I am infirm, and such wickedness among this people doth pain my soul. O Lord, my heart is exceedingly sorrowful; wilt thou comfort my soul in Christ. O Lord, wilt thou grant unto me that I may have strength, that I may suffer with patience these afflictions which shall come upon me, because of the iniquity of this people.”[23] Even so, come, Lord Jesus! [1] 1 Corinthians 1.21 [2] See my homily on Revelation 13, entitled, “My Confessions and the Beast.” [3] Isaiah 2.2-3, author’s translation [4] Isaiah 42.1, 6-7, author’s translation [5] Isaiah 2.4, author’s translation [6] Psalm 67.1-6, author’s translation [7] Isaiah 42.2-4 [8] Isaiah 1.10 [9] Jeremiah 2.10-11 [10] Ezekiel 16.48 [11] 2 Kings 21.9 [12] Jeremiah 3.25 [13] 2 Kings 21.15 [14] Mosiah 29.17 [15] 2 Kings 21.10-14 [16] 2 Kings 24.2-4. We do not accept that God pushed the destruction button on his divine console. Such language is rhetorical. Nevertheless, God knows the consequence of all human behavior, and always warns of them [17] Liz Cheney is the vile man’s latest target of violent rhetoric as he threatens her with a firing squad. There is no reason, zero, to disbelieve the man’s intensions to persecute, arrest, and kill those who oppose him. [18] 1 Nephi 17.22 [19] 1 Nephi 2.13 [20] Mosiah 12.13-15 [21] Isaiah 6.9-12, author’s translation [22] Psalm 94.3 [23] Alma 31.30-31 “…The heart of the sons of men a homily on our mad state of rebellion lies, stories, and sin then
In the spring of 1829, after several months of hectic and sporadic translation, Joseph Smith had produced 116 manuscript pages of what was to be the opening of what would eventually be entitled “The Book of Mormon.” Under pressure from his chief financial supporter, Martin Harris, who wished to “prove” Joseph’s work of translation existed and was true, Joseph allowed Harris to take the manuscript and show it to those whom the latter wished to impress. Under circumstances that to this day remain a mystery, the manuscript disappeared. Soon, Joseph came to learn/ suspect that the disappeared/ stolen manuscript had been altered by those who possessed it. This they had done to expose Joseph as the fraud and liar that they believed him to be. According to DC 10, those who had possession of the manuscript and had altered it were waiting for Joseph to retranslate. If, upon doing so, the retranslation was the same as the original, they would present their altered text as fabricated proof that Joseph was a fraudulent translator. In other words, they created a false story and were prepared to lie in order to catch Joseph telling what they believed to be a lie. In describing the actions of those who had altered the text, their reasons, and their justifications, we read, “Yea, he [Satan] saith unto them: ‘Deceive and lie in wait to catch, that ye may destroy; behold, this is no harm.’ And thus he flattereth them, and telleth them that it is no sin to lie that they may catch a man in a lie, that they might destroy him.”[1] From this passage, we learn several truths. 1. It is sin to tell a lie even if the intent of the lie is to catch another in a lie—whether the other’s lie is real or imagined. 2. The use of lies as a strategy against another is used with the intent and in the interest of destroying another. 3. Those who adopt such a strategy yield to Satan’s flattery as he is the instigator of such a strategy. lies and stories now Recent stories have surfaced that a certain group of immigrants in a central Ohio town have been abducting peoples’ pets—notably dogs and cats. After stealing them, they have taken them to their homes, cooked them, and ate them. Any honest person with half a brain approaches such stories with skepticism, especially anyone knowing world history and the common use of lying stories to attack foreigners, the other. False conspiracy theories and lying stories about foreigners have been a cottage industry in human history. The Hebrew Bible is chock full of salacious stories about Israel’s enemies. In the Middle Ages descendants of those who propagated and then recorded such conspiracy stories in the Hebrew Bible were themselves victims of salacious and lying conspiracy stories as they were accused of killing Christian children and drinking their blood—a crime, I have to believe, worse than having pets for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. Even the “inspired writers” of the Book of Mormon—that Book claimed to be the truest of the true—couldn’t resist slandering the other, those deemed to be enemies and a danger to “true culture.” Speaking of the Nephites enemies, the Lamanites, Enos engaged in a bit of cultural and xenophobic slander. “They were led by their evil nature that they became wild, and ferocious, and a blood-thirsty people, full of idolatry and filthiness; feeding upon beasts of prey; dwelling in tents, and wandering about in the wilderness with a short skin girdle about their loins and their heads shaven; and their skill was in the bow, and in the cimeter, and the ax. And many of them did eat nothing save it was raw meat.”[2] I, for one, am glad that Enos has never joined me for a nice steak dinner when I enjoy my medium to rare ribeye steak. And we won’t even mention the many times that various Book of Mormon authors showed their bigotry by commenting on their enemy’s dark skin color—a bigotry as at home in early 19th century America as it has been throughout human history right into the present. But, back to the poor pets of central Ohio. Local officials have consistently and adamantly declared that the slanderous stories of disappeared pets showing up on the plates of immigrants are false. There is not one iota of evidence. These stories represent a lie. But the fact that these stories are lies has not stopped certain unprincipled and immoral political leaders and pundits on the right from retelling the stories. Indeed, the GOP candidates for president and vice president have been especially exuberant in retelling the debunked stories. Even in the face of fact checking that puts the lie to the stories, they have doubled down and propagated the story on the national stage. As it turns out, by their own admission, these same two evil geniuses have “created the story.” Says the junior partner, J.D. Vance, “I have to create stories so that the American media actually pays attention…” And this admission is offered boastfully, arrogantly, and loudly. Like Israelites of Jeremiah’s day, notwithstanding their sin which they present for all to see, they have “a whore’s forehead” and “refusedst to be ashamed.”[3] In admitting that their story is “created,” of course, they exhibit all the stupidity of a bank robber taking a selfie as he or she robs a bank. But then, neither has ever impressed anyone with their intelligence. These two proud confessors of their lying also exhibit the same sinfulness as those who some two hundred years earlier told a lie in order to catch Joseph in his supposed lie. The media, these latest purveyors of lies claim, has lied, even if only by omission. Therefore, in their warped sense of right and wrong, “it is no sin to lie that they may catch a man in a lie.” It’s just good storytelling, and even better politics. With all of this happening, we must remind our readers with all America of God’s moral evaluation of this evil pairs’ us of lying storytelling. 1. J.D. Vance and the other man whose name I refuse to speak or write have sinned in creating a story that is a lie in order to catch another in a lie—whether the other’s lie is real or imagined. 2. J.D. Vance and the other man whose name I refuse to speak or write use lies as a strategy against others with the intent of and in the interest of destroying others (and, indeed, their lies have brought threats and acts of violence against the innocent and vulnerable community targeted by their lies). 3. J.D. Vance and the other man whose name I refuse to speak or write have yielded to Satan’s flattery as he is the instigator of such a strategy. J.D. Vance and the other man whose name I refuse to speak or write possess the same spirit as Satan. They are destructive. What was true of those infamous lying creators and tellers of lies in Joseph’s day is true of J.D. Vance and his partner in crime, the man whose name I refuse to speak or write. “[Satan] flattereth them, and leadeth them along until he draggeth their souls down to hell; and thus he causeth them to catch themselves in their own snare.” Would to God that it might be soon! It can’t come soon enough for me. signals, totems, and tribes The stories that have been created and repeated about central Ohio immigrants stealing, cooking, and eating “legitimate citizens” pets—I suppose if they were eating their own pets, the story would have less power?—are lies. The telling of such stories is a sin. Those who tell such stories are sinners. These are moral truths. Absolute. The word of God. Having said that as clearly as I know how, anthropologically speaking, these lies possess a kind of twisted and perverted “truth.” They serve as signals and totems. Those who tell the stories and those who embrace them signal to each other that they are on the same team. That they belong to the same tribe. That they are one. There is us and there is them. And we are part of the chosen us. Those who signal those of their tribe through lying stories declare that they are trustworthy members of the tribe. Those who embrace the lying stories told by others in the tribe prove their loyalty to the tribe. Again, huge chunks of the Hebrew Bible’s storytelling serve the role of signal and totem. “We are all members of the same, chosen tribe.” This is often done without regard to “the facts,” and at the expense of the hated and “evil” other. It is often destructive of others. We will again use the Book of Mormon to provide a parade example of signaling a tribal “truth” of trustworthiness, unity, and superiority through the lie of storytelling. In Alma 31, we meet a group of “dissenters” designated, “Zoramites.” After dissenting from their Nephite religious tradition—a dissent that also had political overtones and repercussions—they established their own form of religion, religious institutions, and sacred places. They built themselves a high platform which they designated, “rameumptom.” From this sacred space, they prayed. Like many cultic prayers, including LDS sacrament prayers, it was always the same prayer. Holy, holy God; we believe that thou art God, and we believe that thou art holy, and that thou wast a spirit, and that thou art a spirit, and that thou wilt be a spirit forever. Holy God, we believe that thou hast separated us from our brethren; and we do not believe in the tradition of our brethren, which was handed down to them by the childishness of their fathers; but we believe that thou hast elected us to be thy holy children; and also thou hast made it known unto us that there shall be no Christ. But thou art the same yesterday, today, and forever; and thou hast elected us that we shall be saved, whilst all around us are elected to be cast by thy wrath down to hell; for the which holiness, O God, we thank thee; and we also thank thee that thou hast elected us, that we may not be led away after the foolish traditions of our brethren, which doth bind them down to a belief of Christ, which doth lead their hearts to wander far from thee, our God. And again we thank thee, O God, that we are a chosen and a holy people. Amen.”[4] This is storytelling in the form of prayer. It is an act of signaling. It signals unity. It signals community. It signals superiority or “election.” Now, often when we consider this Zoramite storytelling/ prayer, we focus on its doctrinal falsehoods, especially the one in which they proclaim that God “hast made it known unto us that there shall be no Christ.” It is true that “factually,” the prayer/ story is mostly lies and half-truths. But anthropologically, it possesses a great group “truth” that is far more important than the facts. “Thou hast separated us from our brethren” “We do not believe in the tradition of our brethren” “Thou hast elected us to be thy holy children” “Thou hast elected us that we shall be saved” “All around us are elected to be cast by thy wrath down to hell” “[We] thank thee that thou hast elected us” “We [are] not… led away after the foolish traditions of our brethren” “We are a chosen and a holy people” The stories that the GOP presidential and vice-presidential candidates are telling about immigrants eating citizen’s pets fills the same function as this Zoramite prayer. It establishes and solidifies group identity and unity. It does little good to wonder and ask whether those who adopt the lying stories such as that of the Zoramites or the GOP presidential and vice-presidential candidates believe the lies contained in the story. The signal is more important to those who disseminate and accept the stories than the facts. And the signal is anthropologically “true”—though the man who goes always unnamed can pervert even this, as the only “us” he is truly interested in is the “I,” “me,” “myself.” The signal bears witness that they have all been elected into the same superior tribe and all others are going to hell: the facts be damned. Of course, as we have seen, such lying storytelling does lead to hell. However, it is those who perpetrate such lying stories and those who adopt the lying stories as their own who are in danger of suffering he darkness of hell. conclusion There are, Jesus teaches, two commandments: love God and love others. These two can be seen as a summary of what is arguably the most famous commandments in human history: the Ten Commandments. The first three commandments concern the love of God. The last six commandments concern the love of others. The fourth commandment can be viewed as a transitional command, focused on both love of God and love of others. The final seven commandments are stipulations against doing harm to others. The fourth, transitional, commandment concerns the observance of a day of rest. To not observe a day of rest—especially at the societal level—is to harm workers (including animals!), treating them not so very differently than the Egyptians treated the Israelites in enslaving them.[5] To disregard the commandment to honor one’s parents harms them in the later years when they are in need of help from their younger more able children. The harm that is done to others when there is failure to observe the commandments prohibiting murder, adultery, theft, lying about others, and covetousness is obvious. The Ten Commandments, then, at the very least teach us to do no harm. Lumped in with the harms is that of lying about others. The prohibition against lying is not simply a prohibition against making false statements of facts. Lies are more than false statements of facts. Lies are false statements of facts with the intent to do harm. Those who altered the text found on the 116 manuscript pages created a lying story to catch another in their supposed lie. They lied with the intent to do harm. The language of DC 10 is stronger than this, however. Those who altered the text found on the 116 manuscript pages and created a lying story intended to ”destroy.” This is repeated over and over again in Section 10. They intended to destroy the young man, Joseph, (10.6, 19, 25). They intended to destroy “the work” he was trying to accomplish (10.12, 23). They intended to destroy “the gift” he had been given to accomplish the work (10.7). This intent to destroy through telling a lying story was directly inspired by Satan. “He saith unto them: ‘Deceive and lie in wait to catch, that ye may destroy.”[6] This whispered anti-revelation of using a lie to destroy—the only kind of “lie” that spiritually exists—was sin. It made no difference whether the other was right or wrong. Even lying about or against another liar is sin. This whispered anti-revelation of using a lie to destroy is consistent with the very character and intention of Lucifer himself who “goeth up and down, to and fro in the earth, seeking to destroy the souls of men.”[7] Satan is the very “father of lies.”[8] He it is who inspires those who create lying stories. Just as those who altered the lost manuscript and created a lie to deceive and destroy, America’s present GOP presidential and vice-presidential candidates have create a lying story to deceive and to destroy. Whereas those who altered the manuscript remain in obscurity and hid their deeds, the GOP vice presidential candidate, anyway, has opening admitted to creating a lying story in order to catch others in a supposed lie—one of omission. More perfectly satanic and more steeped in the art of lying than his vice-presidential partner, the GOP presidential candidate makes no admission of lying. Like Lucifer, he is incapable of distinguishing truth from fiction and lives only to destroy. He will say anything as long as it fits his destructive purposes. The lying story these two servants of Satan have created is intended to do harm to immigrants living in central Ohio. Indeed, it has done harm to thousands of innocent and legal immigrants living in central Ohio. But the lying stories these two demons tell about central Ohio immigrants are not intended to harm only central Ohio immigrants. They are intended to harm immigrants in every state, town, county, and community in America. Indeed, the GOP presidential candidate has been open from the very beginning of his terrifying entrance onto the national stage about his intent to do them harm. Those who gladly received and adopt the lying story may or may not believe the facts of the story. But they believe the anthropological signal the lying story sends. They believe the liar is one of them and that they are one with the liar. They are members of the same tribe and possess the same election. The acceptance of the lying story establishes and solidifies group identity and unity. Unfortunately, in receiving and adopting the lying story they also reveal themselves to possess the same spirit of harmfulness and destruction. They join the throng of satanic angels who rejoice in Satan’s plan to destroy the souls of as many humans as possible. Among the many wonders Enoch saw in his visions, “he beheld Satan.” He saw that Satan “had a great chain in his hand, and it veiled the whole face of the earth with darkness.” He saw that Satan “looked up and laughed” as he saw the suffering that the darkness caused. And he saw that Satan’s “angels rejoiced.”[9] I sincerely suggest that my readers resist and combat the two satanic angels who create lying stories to destroy lest they become numbered among the choirs of satanic angels who rejoice in the destruction that Satan brings until, sooner or later, they find themselves chained with the veil of darkness and destruction that they thought to inflict upon others through their beloved lying stories. Even so, come, Lord Jesus! [1] DC 10.25 [2] Enos 1.20 [3] Jeremiah 3.3 [4] Alma 31.15-18 [5] See Deuteronomy 5.12-15 [6] DC 10.25 [7] DC 10.27 [8] See 2 Nephi 9.9 [9] See Moses 7.26 “…The heart of the sons of men healing our brokenness inadequately (part 12): a homily on just society and our mad state of rebellion introduction to the series
Judicial inequality and injustice. Economic inequality and injustice. Rampant greed and fraud on the part of wealthy individuals and essential institutions. Bribery and corruption of government officials. Inordinate influence of the wealthy on laws and public policy. Unjust laws and policies favoring the powerful and influential while disadvantaging the less powerful and influential. The infliction of the vulnerable with hunger, homelessness, sickness, and anxiety. Self-righteous justification of the mad state of rebellion. Stubborn refusal to acknowledge these and a host of other societal ills. No, I am not talking about America of 2024. However, if the shoe fits… I am talking about late 6th and early 5th century B.C. Judah. These, and many other evils undermined the temporal, moral, and spiritual health of the nation. All the signs were there. The nation was on the verge of collapse. It was in desperate need of truth, however sour it might be to the national palate. But the nation’s shepherds fed the populace an empty diet of propagandistic myths of nationalism and materialism. Many of Israel’s prophets joined the fray. Israel’s watchmen, Jeremiah charged, “Heal my people’s brokenness inadequately, asserting: ‘It’s OK! It’s OK!’” “But nothing,” Jeremiah replies, “is OK!” Does this, too, sound familiar? Strike close to home? It should. Too often, today’s religious leaders—whether they go by the name, “prophet,” “priest,” or “pastor”— seem to lack both discernment and courage. They seem utterly blind to and mute about sin and evil, unless, of course, it involves some form of real or imagined sexual deviance. If they do speak out on matters of social justice, it is often with muted, vague, delicate, and generalized voices and statements. These shepherds seem not up to the challenging task of bold and clear truth telling of the sort that our society so desperately needs. But now is not the time for delicacy and caution. This homily is the twelfth in an ongoing series entitled, “Healing Our Brokenness Inadequately,” based on Jeremiah 6.14. In this series, we explore specific examples of individual and societal sins about which political and religious leaders all too often remain willfully blind or, if sighted, stubbornly mute… and therefore complicit. Tragically, sometimes their complicity is even active and enthusiastic. With these examples in mind, we will often call upon the classic Hebrew prophets as well as other ancient and not so ancient prophets to speak as if from the dust. We read these discerning writings in light of the societal ills and injustices that abound in our modern world. Sometimes we even imagine and take a stab at replicating what a Hebrew prophet might have to say if he were to come to us from the past. In today’s homily, we offer an additional example of our brokenness about which too many remain silent and worse, in which too many religious leaders engage in and benefit from themselves. Such moments as ours desperately cry out for the type of discernment, boldness, and truth-telling so characteristic of the Hebrew prophets. policing price-gouging The American right is at it again. Raising the laughable specter of “communism.” It happens anytime decent people stand up for the downtrodden against the legalized down treading that the wealthy, influential, and powerful perpetrate against them. Unfortunately, America’s “left,” (while there is a cultural left, there is no economic left in America, and certainly none left enough for yours truly—hence the quotation marks), as it always is, will most likely be intimated and cowed into retreat. Those on the “left” are too often as mesmerized and star-struck by the mythic sacralization of profit as their more proudly avaricious and less hypocritical compatriots on their right. What is the nature of the left’s most recent foray into the red of communism? Its presidential candidate as had the audacity to suggest that the ravenous price gouging of America’s rapacious businesses ought to be halted. Put differently, the crime of price gouging ought to be policed—the right is really into policing, or so they claim. Imagine that… the one condemning price gouging is attacked more than the price gougers! Rather than retreating, perhaps the left could step up and confess that the idea of policing the crime of price gouging is not communistic, but moral. And it is most certainly biblical, even if it isn’t very American. We have on several occasions utilized the following passage to address several of the many modern economic iniquities that plague our society. Today we use it in relation to the very biblical proposal of one of the U.S. presidential candidates that U.S. legislators, shepherds of their flock, ought to stand against and police price gouging and end harmful and immoral greedflation. “Hear this, those who weary the impoverished to the end that they ruin the land’s downtrodden-- thinking: “when will the new moon sabbath be over so that we can sell grain; and the weekly sabbath so that we can make our produce available, while shrinking the size of the dry measure, increasing the weight of šeqel, and rigging fraudulent scales to buy the underprivileged with money and the impoverished at the cost of a pair of sandals. We will even sell worthless debris mixed in with the grain!”[1] This is prophetic advocacy for quality controls, quantity controls, and price controls. It is a prophetic call for the policing of price gouging. Now, before applying this prophetic call to ourselves, as scripture so clearly expects us to do, we should take a moment to examine the process of wheat production, selling, and buying that underpins this passage. In Amos’ day, after wheat was harvested from the field in was taken to a threshing floor where it was winnowed. During this winnowing process, wheat was repeatedly thrown into the air, allowing the wind to blow away the wheat husks and other debris that had mixed with the wheat kernels during the harvesting process. While the debris was blown away, the nutritious wheat grain itself fell to the ground where it was collected and prepared for sale. Winnowing, then, was meant to produce a quality produce for sale. Amos informs us that wheat sellers either skipped this winnowing process or somehow performed it so that the wheat they sold contained husks and other debris mixed in with the wheat kernels. By either not winnowing at all or winnowing less, the seller saved money and increased profits by reducing the labor costs associated with winnowing. In addition, by mixing useless and nutrition-less debris with good nutritious wheat, wheat sellers were able to stretch their grain out over more sales and even further increase their profit margins. But in their drive for increased profit margins, Israelite merchants did not stop there. Wheat sellers engaged in additional unethical business practices. They falsified their weights and measures and the tools they utilized in weighing and measuring. We can easily visualize the unethical business practices that Amos describes. We will first describe how the transaction between a buyer and seller of wheat was conducted. The buyer came to the seller and requested a certain measure of wheat (we will say a “pound” to make it relatable), for which the buyer agreed to pay one shekel (in the pre-coinage era, a weight, not coin) of silver. The merchant placed a one-pound weight on the left side of a heavy-duty commercial scale used to measure dry goods. This caused the left scale to lower. He then began to add wheat to the right side of the scale. The left rose, the right side lowered until, finally, the two sides sat next to each other at equilibrium. The seller then dumped the wheat from the scale into a receptacle for transport. Now, it was time for the buyer to pay. The seller placed a weight equivalent to a shekel on one side of a second smaller, light-duty commercial scale used to weight metal. The buyer placed their silver on the other side of the scale until the two sides were at equilibrium. The buyer could then leave with their wheat. All this was acceptable business practice. However, in the transaction as Amos describes it, the one-pound weight that the merchant used to measure the wheat was not, in fact, a full pound, but, say, 7/8 a pound, thus cheating the buyer of the amount of wheat for which they paid. In addition, the merchant manipulated his scales in some way so that the two sides were slightly out of equilibrium to begin with. Therefore, our customer walked away with something even less than the already scant 7/8 pounds of wheat. Contrary to American practice of mythification, Amos does not chalk such behavior up to “market forces” as if economics were a matter of natural law akin to, say, the law of gravity. This unethical behavior was a volitional choice of human beings. It could only flow out of human lust for increased profit margins that overrode every other consideration, including the impact such practices had on real people and society at large. Amos viewed the merchants’ unethical business practices not only in economic terms but in spiritual and religious terms as well. This unethical behavior was sinful wickedness, a breach against humanity as well as rebellion against God. Amos demands an end to such practices. By calling for an end to such practices, the prophet is engaged in an ancient form of price control. He expects government and business leaders to regulate, or police prices and end price gouging. This is consistent with the law codes of the Hebrew Bible. “You are not to engage in injustice in regard to administering the measurement of length, weight, or volume. You are to possess accurate balances, accurate weights, accurate dry measures, and accurate liquid measures. I am YHWH, your God, who brought you out of Egypt.” [2] When those who governed in Israel failed to uphold such laws and, worse, actually wrote laws in such ways as to “legalize” the sort of behavior that Amos so clearly condemns as ungodly, the Hebrew prophets were not shy about calling out those leaders. “A tragic Warning! To those who issue oppressive statutes and continuously write laws that afflict; that put redress out of the reach of the underprivileged and rob the poor among my people of justice, making prey of widows and plundering orphans”[3] How very badly we need religious leaders to truly take up the mantle of the Hebrew prophets! application We do not deny the merchant’s right to a profit. But we do deny, and expect moral people everywhere to deny, the sorts of profits that have been a part of our latest battle with inflation. In these most recent battles with inflation, some increases in costs have been due to various continuing disruptions caused by the COVID pandemic. Some increases in costs, for example, have been due to continuing supply chain disruptions. These are facts (We do question the “fact” that the increases in costs were significantly due to people having too much money, which is rather like blaming the victim rather than the victimizer). But it is also a fact, demonstrated over and over again, that not an insignificant portion of inflated prices went well beyond extra costs of production, labor, transportation, etc. Not only did prices go up, profit margins went up as well, in many cases exorbitantly. Rather than being used to make capital and customer service improvements, these exorbitant profits served to increase pay for CEO’s of questionable usefulness and necessity, and increased returns for shareholder of insatiable appetite. A not insignificant portion of price increases that have afflicted so many worldwide have been the consequence of greed—some suggesting up to half of the increased costs stemmed from greed—making “greedflation” an apt and accurate term. Tragically, unjust laws have in no small part facilitated this greedflation. One example will have to suffice. Chicken. The wizards of economics demand that government get out of the way of business and let “the market” dictate practices, including pricing. The consumer, the mythology goes, is one of many controllers of costs. If the cost of chicken, for example, grows too high, the consumer will stop buying, or buy from a competitor. But, this has two major problems. First, “consumers,” who business treats as objects rather than people, must eat. We can’t stop buying food—or housing, or any number of other necessities—because it is expensive. Second, at the behest of unscrupulous economic sorcerers, legislators and the judiciary have gutted anti-monopoly laws. Because of this gutting, in the example of chicken, there are limited suppliers of chicken. Consumers cannot go to a competitor to buy cheaper chicken, because there are few competitors, and those that might exists are engaged together in what amounts to legalized price fixing with their one or two “competitors.” In many industries, “competition” is nonexistent. Well, we could go on and on critiquing the collusion between government and business that harms citizens and consumers. The harmful collusion took off with the venerable rightwing Ronald Reagan and the economic sorcerers who cast their devious spell upon him. Since then, with ever increasing insistence, all restraint upon business and their profits and profit margins have become anathema—the restraint being more evil than the immoral conduct itself. Even so-called leftist, such as Bill Clinton or Barak Obama have listened as economic wizards whispered lies into their willing ears. People all over the world have been sold out, becoming slaves to profit margins. “They sell out the innocent in order to turn a profit. They sell out the impoverished in order to acquire a pair of sandals. They lust after the dirt that is found in the hair of the poor, and make the life of those already distressed even more precarious.”[4] Worse, people all over the world have been chopped up into little pieces and fed to the ungodly and ravenous beast of laissez faire capitalism. “I am warning: Yaʿaqōb’s elite must listen right now, along with Yiśrāʾēl’s governing officials: Isn’t it incumbent on You to determine what is just-- the very ones who hate what is beneficial and love what is harmful; the very ones who strip their skin right off them, and their flesh from off their bones; the very ones who have eaten my people’s flesh, stripped their skin right off them, snapped their bones, chopped them into little pieces to fit in a pot, as meat in a caldron.”[5] The Hebrew prophets would never stand silent in the face of such inhumane barbarism. Those who would claim their mantle today cannot remain silent without being shown, like the proverbial emperor without clothes, to be naked, without prophetic mantle or divine truth. conclusion We do believe, as Hebrew prophets such as Amos did, that profits and especially profit margins should be regulated, policed. It is humane. It is moral. It is right. It is biblical. Before the nation gave itself to bestiality, it was once American. Now, make no mistake about it. In the attempt to control inflation, the U.S. government through its Federal Reserve has been engaged in “price control.” The fed has sought to control prices by raising interest rates. So, the idea that “price controls” is inappropriate is a lie. The idea that it is some kind of evil communist plot is a lie. But, the Feds method of price control has disproportionately and most harmfully impacted regular people, especially vulnerable people—have a look at chicken, again, or the cost of housing. Somehow, the economic sorcerers have convinced everyone that policing pricing by policing the consumer is not only appropriate but mandatory. It is righteous. At the same time, these wizards have convinced everyone that policing the seller in order to control prices is not only inappropriate and unnecessary, but is downright wicked, communistic. What a marvelous slight of hand! What a magnificent piece of mythmaking? But we claim a wisdom that is higher and nobler than the myths that the wizards of economy whisper into the willing ears of businessmen, legislators, and judges. We reject the wizard’s myth and magical thinking that sacralizes profit and secularizes human beings. We reject the false doctrine that maximizing profit is righteous. We reject the lie that profits are sacrosanct and must not be policed in any way. We reject the wealthy’s claim of innocence and righteousness. “A merchant with an inaccurate scale at hand enjoys defrauding. And, ʾEprayim thinks, “I’m rich! I have discovered the source of power! With all my profits, no one will identify my abuse as sin.”[6] We reject the blasphemy that wealth, however high it is piled, can hide a multitude of sins. It is just such slights of hand that the Hebrew prophets rejected. When they observed prices increase—often at the same time that product decreased in quantity and quality—they looked to the seller. They examined the seller’s behavior and business practices. They demanded that their behavior and business practices be reformed. They did not, as so many false prophets have and do, heal the brokenness of human nature inadequately. They did not remain mute. They did not call “OK,” what was not OK. May it be so today. Even so, come, Lord Jesus! [1] Amos 8.4-6, author’s translation [2] Leviticus 19.35-37; author’s translation [3] Isaiah 10.1-2, author’s translation [4] See Amos 2.6-7, author’s translation. [5] Micah 3.1-3, author’s translation [6] Hosea 12.7-8, author’s translation. “…The heart of the sons of men a homily on just society and our mad state of rebellion |
Archives
November 2024
Categories |